So interesting. It seems like writing for AI conflicts with part of the reward felt after the uncomfortable and vulnerable process of writing. Usually, it pays off because you end up with something raw and beautiful, but in this case, the outcome is modified on purpose to scale it down from full sensitivity to consumable across the group. It makes sense to do this if the goal is for AI to be less complicated or confrontational (in other words, less human) - but it makes me wonder if eventually those parameters will change over time? Will that sensitivity level increase within the median tolerance or will the median tolerance become complacent to the "overly flattering or agreeable" AI? It seems right that the sensitivity level increases, but then wouldn't that also inevitably mean AI becomes more human? And is that what we really want? Ok went down the rabbit hole 🐰
I keep thinking that kids also have no concept of shame… and maybe ai is just at that stage now
Yikes.
So interesting. It seems like writing for AI conflicts with part of the reward felt after the uncomfortable and vulnerable process of writing. Usually, it pays off because you end up with something raw and beautiful, but in this case, the outcome is modified on purpose to scale it down from full sensitivity to consumable across the group. It makes sense to do this if the goal is for AI to be less complicated or confrontational (in other words, less human) - but it makes me wonder if eventually those parameters will change over time? Will that sensitivity level increase within the median tolerance or will the median tolerance become complacent to the "overly flattering or agreeable" AI? It seems right that the sensitivity level increases, but then wouldn't that also inevitably mean AI becomes more human? And is that what we really want? Ok went down the rabbit hole 🐰